Legal Opinion

In Re Varnell

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2003No. S104614PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Penal Code section 1385, subdivision (a) 1 authorizes a trial court to “order an action to be dismissed” if the dismissal is “in furtherance of justice.” Our case law has construed section 1385 to permit a court to dismiss individual counts in accusatory pleadings (People v. Polk (1964) 61 Cal.2d 217, 225-228 [37 Cal.Rptr. 753, 390 P.2d 641]), sentencing enhancements (see People v. Thomas (1992) 4 Cal.4th 206, 210 [14 Cal.Rptr.2d 174, 841 P.2d 159]), allegations that the defendant has suffered a prior conviction (People v. Burke (1956) 47 Cal.2d 45, 49-53 [301 P.2d 241]), and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. FuentesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. ORABUENACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API