Legal Opinion

Hammargren v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1952No. 38,487PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This' action was to recover for damages alleged to have been sustained when plaintiffs were caused to be falsely imprisoned by defendants. Judgment was for the plaintiffs and defendants have appealed.

There were two actions, one by the wife and one by the husband. They were consolidated in the trial court and tried together. They have been presented in this court as one appeal. Hereafter the pleadings will refer to the pleading in the case of the wife since they are identical with the exception of the names. At the outset, the George Innes…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Will v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Jones v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Donley v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Thompson v. General Finance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lewis v. Farmer Jack Division, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Sweaney v. United Loan & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API