Legal Opinion
Rancho Mirage Country Club Homeowners Ass'n v. Hazelbaker
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 9, 2016No. E063272PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, J.
—Defendants and appellants Thomas B. Hazelbaker and Lynn G. Hazelbaker own, through their family trust, a condominium in the Rancho Mirage Country Club development. Defendants made improvements to an exterior patio, which plaintiff and respondent Rancho Mirage Country Club Homeowners Association (Association) contended were in violation of the applicable covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs). The parties mediated the dispute pursuant to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Davis-Stirling Act or the Act), codified at sections 4000 to 6150 of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ahdoot v. Chernyavskiy CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Cash v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Champir, LLC v. Fairbanks Ranch Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Colyear v. Rolling Hills Community Assn. of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.