Legal Opinion

Maple v. Burnside

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

The appellees sued the appellant on a note. *140At the same time they caused a writ of attachment to issue against the property of the then defendant, which was returned served,- &c. The defendant appeared and by separate paragraphs of his answer put in issue the allegations in the complaint and those in the affidavit for the order of attachment. It appears from the record that the Court tried the “cause of action on the note,” and rendered a judgment for the plaintiff; and as to the “attachment suit and proceedings herein,” a jury trial was had, but no verdict rendered. The case was continued…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Bank of the StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Foster v. DryfusIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Bates v. SpoonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. McCollem v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Monteith v. BaxNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Ford Motor Credit Company LLC v. Fincannon Ford IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API