Legal Opinion

Foster v. Dryfus

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1861PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Foster sued Dry fus for money demands on contract. At the same time, on an affidavit and bond filed, he caused writs of attachment to issue against the property of the defendant, which were served and returned. The defendant appeared and pleaded to the action, without controverting, or avoiding the facts alleged in the affidavit for the attachment. Trial, and verdict for the plaintiff. After *159verdict, and before judgment, the defendant moved to dismiss the attachment, “ on the sole ground that the plaintiff had not given in evidence to the jury the affidavit for attachment filed herein, nor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Biddinger v. ManlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Collins v. NicholsIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Hosier v. EliasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Cooper v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bates v. SpoonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Lowry v. McGeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Bradley v. Bank of the StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Gass v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Halbert v. HENDRIXIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API