Legal Opinion

Albright v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1966No. 41648PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

1. The first special ground (ground 4) of the motion for a new trial complains of the following portion of the charge: “Now these documents are very lengthy. They are in numbered paragraphs and make various references back and forth and I am not going to read them to you in their entirety because I do not believe it would be of any benefit in helping you understand the issues between these parties.” It is contended that this charge was confusing and misleading to the jury because it minimized the importance of the pleadings in the case, particularly with respect to the answer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Jones v. McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Vickers v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Bazemore v. MacDougald Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanselmann v. McCardleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Hoffman v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Miller v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Baker v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Dunn v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API