Legal Opinion

Miller v. Dean

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1966No. 42101PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. In a negligence action the plaintiff is not, as a matter of law, entitled to recover some amount because the defendant admitted negligence and fault on his part and plaintiff testified that she received some injury, as did her doctor, who, in finding evidence of injury when examining her, also based his opinion upon her history of the accident and her complaints. “[A] mere showing [or ad*870mission] of negligence on the part of the defendant is insufficient to establish a right to recover.” Albright v. Powell, 113 Ga. App. 363, 368 (147 SE2d 848). The jury may, from the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. May v. SorrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Mendel v. PinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Holmes v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Imperial Investment Co. v. Modernization Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Mullis v. ChaikaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Hiter v. ShelpCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Blevins v. Atlantic Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Claridy v. BearCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API