Legal Opinion

Bazemore v. MacDougald Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1951No. 33714PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first four acts of negligence alleged in paragraph 25, set forth in the statement of facts hereof, considered together and in connection with other paragraphs of the petition relating to the alleged negligence of the defendant, would present a jury question as to whether the defendant was guilty of such negligence as to authorize the plaintiff’s recovery, in crushing and breaking the sidewalk so as to make its use by pedestrians unsafe, knowing that pedestrians would be using it—the failure to erect any barrier or other warning of the danger, and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Tybee Amusement Co. v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Americus Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Wright v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1866
  5. Abercrombie v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Long Construction Co. v. RyalsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Tucker v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Hatcher v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API