Legal Opinion

Eberlein v. Stockyards Mortgage & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1925No. 24,626PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In 1919 defendant was operating as a trust company and in June of that year sold to plaintiff a note and certain bonds of the aggregate face value of $3,000. Plaintiff claims that, as a part of the contract of sale, defendant agreed that, if at any time thereafter while plaintiff was the owner of the paper he should so request, the defendant would repurchase it at “full face value and accrued interest.” It is upon the alleged contract of repurchase that this action is brought. After a verdict for plaintiff, and an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial, defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Continental Ins. Co. v. SchulmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wait v. . BorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Bloomingdale v. CushmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McGee v. Breezy Point EstatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Smith v. Emporium Mercantile Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Greene v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Schlick v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Crookston State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API