Legal Opinion
Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Crookston State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 3, 1926No. 25,567PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dibei/L, J.
Action upon a guaranty by the defendant of a note made by one Weldon to the Minnesota Loan & Trust Company and assigned to the plaintiff. There were findings for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
On February 13, 1918, the officers of the defendant delivered to the Minnesota Loan & Trust Company an instrument in the following form:
“Crookston State Bank, Crookston, Minn.
“February 13th, 1918.
“For Value Received, The undersigned promises The Minnesota Loan and Trust Company of Minneapolis, Minnesota, that if, at any time within…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- People's Bank v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Commercial Nat. Bank v. PirieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Gause v. . Commonwealth Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Greene v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Federal Land Bank v. Crookston Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Brown v. Union Banking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Freedman v. Madison & Kedzie State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Westchester Trust Co. v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.