Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Small Refiner Lead Phase-Down Task Force v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 22, 1983No. Nos. 82-2282, 82-2283, 82-2308, 82-2395 and 82-2521PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I. Background------------- 206

A. Early Regulation of Gasoline Lead---------------------------- 207

B. The Current Regulation_____________________________________ 207

C. Issues Presented___________________________________________ 209

II. EPA’s Statutory Authority.....„............._................ 209

A. Authority to Regulate Small Refiners_________________________ 210

B. The Relationship Between the Gasoline Lead Standard and the Ambient Air Quality Standard for Lead------------------------ 211

III. Judicial Review Under Clean Air Act § 307(d)__________________ _ _ 213

A.…

Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. State of Ohio v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Asarco Inc., Intervenors. National Wildlife Federation v. Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Chemical Manufacturers Association, American Petroleum Institute, Asarco Inc., Intervenors. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Petroleum Institute, American Mining Congress, Asarco, Inc., Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. State of Colorado v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. State of New York v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco, Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. People of the State of California, Ex Rel. John K. Van De Kamp, Attorney General of California v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. Chemical Manufacturers Association v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., National Wildlife Federation, Intervenors. Public Service Electric & Gas Company, and Dana Corporation v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., National Wildlife Federation, Intervenors. National Wildlife Federation v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior, State of New York v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. Ohio v. United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. County of Del Norte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Donna L. Nichols v. Board of Trustees of the Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API