Legal Opinion
County of Del Norte v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1984No. Nos. 83-1761, 83-2018, 83-1770 and 83-2019PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.
This is a challenge to the Secretary of the Interior’s designation of parts of five northern California rivers as components of the national wild and scenic river system under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1271-1287 (1982). Plaintiffs include several California counties and entities that represent timber and water interests. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, holding that the designation was defective because of procedural irregularities. The government appeals.
Secretary of the Interior Cecil Andrus designated the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- California v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Shweta Kohli v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Kolek v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.