Ohio v. United States Department of Interior
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALD, Chief Judge, and SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON III and MIKVA, Circuit Judges:1
Petitioners are 10 states, three environmental organizations (“State and Environmental Petitioners”), a chemical industry trade association, a manufacturing company and a utility company (“Industry Petitioners”), who seek review of regulations promulgated by the Department of the Interior (“DOJ” or “Interior”) pursuant to § 301(c)(l)-(3)' of the Comprehensive EnvironmentaLResponse, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA” or the “Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9651(c). The regulations govern the recovery of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation v. United States Department of the Interior, American Iron and Steel Institute, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Council, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Coakley v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- State of Ohio v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Satsky v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.