Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:1
In these 15 eases, consolidated for purposes of argument and decision, petitioners challenge various facets of four orders of the Federal Communications Commission which, taken together, regulate and limit the program fare “cablecasters”2 and “subscription broadcast television stations”3 may offer to the public for a fee set on a per-program or per-channel basis.4 Technically, the orders reviewed here amend previous, more stringent, Commission rules.5 While this procedural nicety has not gone *18unnoticed by those petitioners who attack only the amendments to the rules on the theory…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by397 opinions
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Honorable Ronald v. Dellums v. James M. Powell, Chief, United States Capitol Police, Jerry v. Wilson, Chief, Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- City of Waukesha v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Public Citizen, Inc., Aviation Consumer Action Project, and Families of Pan-Am 103/lockerbie v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
392 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.