Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Lee Pare & Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided July 2, 1991No. 89-505-AppealPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY, Justice.
The plaintiffs 1 appeal from the grant of summary judgment to the defendants Bick-erton Iron Works, Inc. (Bickerton), and Alliance Machine Company (Alliance). For the reasoning that follows, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.
Bickerton
Final judgment under Rule 54(b) of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure was entered for Bickerton on July 20, 1989. 2 Thus plaintiffs’ twenty-day appeal period under Rule 4(a) 3 of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure began on July 20, and ended on August 9. At the beginning of September plaintiffs moved for a thirty-day…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogelio J. Cuevas v. Reading & Bates Corp., A/K/A Reading & Bates Offshore Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Alfonso Meza, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Renzalo Melton v. Anthony FrankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Uag West Bay Am, LLC v. CambioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- Kay v. MenardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- Millman v. MillmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- Samuelian v. Town of CoventrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Family Dollar Stores of Rhode Island, Inc. v. Justin B. AraujoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.