Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. Evans
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1990No. Nos. 87-2851, 88-1230PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Case No. 88-1230
Case No. 88-1230 involves a jurisdictional issue in the appeal filed by one of the defendants, Harvey Young Airport (HYA), and concerning the plaintiffs in the underlying federal court action, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London. The facts relevant to the jurisdictional issue are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Allender v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Mr. Jesse Pinion, Mrs. Jesse Pinion, Maurice Daffron, Shirley Daffron v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Weitz v. Lovelace Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Lisa Panhorst Joanne Jones John M. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. GardunoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.