Legal Opinion

Kay v. Menard

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 22, 1999No. 97-535-AppealPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Court on January 25,1999, pursuant to our order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the plaintiffs motion to dismiss the defendant’s appeal should not be summarily decided. After consideration of the parties’ legal memoranda and oral argument by their counsel, we conclude that cause has not been shown and we proceed to summarily decide the timeliness of the defendant’s appeal that is raised by the plaintiffs motion to dismiss.

In this motion by the plaintiff, we are called upon to decide when the appeal time commences to run, following entry in…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tommie Kline v. Department of Health & Human Services Indian Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Farkas v. RumoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Abbatematteo v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. Friedman v. Lee Pare & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Radiation Oncology Associates, Inc. v. Roger Williams HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  2. Uag West Bay Am, LLC v. CambioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  3. Malinou v. Seattle Savings BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. Turacova v. DeThomasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  5. Kay v. MenardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API