Legal Opinion

Sbarbaro v. Rosa

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1941No. Civ. 6440PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J. pro tem.

This case began as a proceeding to dissolve a partnership alleged to have existed between plaintiff Sbarbaro and the defendant Alfiso Rosa. The other parties defendant were included by reason of their alleged claims in or to certain partnership assets. An accounting was asked.

Issues were joined by the various parties and the ease came on regularly for trial. The court below determined first the issue of partnership and therein an accounting was had. The partnership by decree was dissolved and the partnership accounts settled. The foregoing will suffice as a general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CleverdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Johnson v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Dugan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Schwarze v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Parigian v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of JafemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. California Trust Company v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  4. Ebberts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  5. Dale v. DaleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API