Dale v. Dale
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
The parties entered into -a partnership to operate a sawmill near Mayhill. Difficulties arose and appellant instituted this action for a dissolution of the partnership and for an accounting.
It is charged that appellee, as managing partner, has converted the partnership funds to his own use, and that he has failed to keep an adequate partnership account. The charges are denied, nevertheless, ap-pellee concedes the partnership should be dissolved. From a judgment against him, appellant seeks a review here.
The findings material to a decision, are:
“3. That shortly after the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bracht v. ConnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Sbarbaro v. RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Poulette v. ChainayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sanchez v. SaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ream v. FitzenUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Rogers v. StacyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Gilon v. FrancoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Gomez v. Snyder RanchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.