In re Haymond
California Supreme Court
ACCUSATION in the Supreme Court, at the instance of the Bar Association of San Francisco, to disbar an attorney. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
Application at the instance of the Bar Association of San Francisco.
It is charged that the accused has violated his oath of office and his duty as an attorney, in that he has failed to maintain the respect due to the courts of justice, and has not discharged his duty as an attorney and counselor to the best of his ability.
It is recited that one Albert F. G. YeresenecockockliofE was being tried in Department Twelve of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco upon a charge of the crime of murder. He w;as being defended by three counsel, one of whom was B. W. McIntosh, Esq.,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by18 opinions
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Fish v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re VaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re DampierIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.