Legal Opinion
Houston Nat. Exch. Bank of Houston v. De Blanc
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 19, 1923No. 885PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.
The following statement of the nature and result of the suit is taken from the brief of appellant, the same being accepted as correct by appellee:
“This was an action in debt instituted by M. A. De Blanc against James E. Ferguson of Bell County, Tex., - and the Houston National Exchange Bank of Houston, Tex., the basis of the action being the contract of employment between plaintiff and defendant Ferguson. The Houston National Exchange Bank'was made a party to the action.because of the fact that it had a chattel mortgage on the stock and cattle which plaintiff claimed were subservient to a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Reeves & Co. v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- McIlhenny, Admr., and U. T. Co. v. BinzTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- American Type Founders Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- American Type Founders' Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commercial Credit Co. v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Hooser v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Blalack & Son v. San Antonio Cattle Loan Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
- Inesco, Inc. v. SearsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- San Antonio Cattle Loan v. Blalack SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.