McIlhenny, Admr., and U. T. Co. v. Binz
Texas Supreme Court
The opinion gives a sufficient statement.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Associate Justice.
This suit was originally instituted by the Houston East & West Texas Railway Company and Mary Louise Bremond, Edward L. Bremond, Harriet Timpson, John A. Dozier and his wife, Mary Pauline Dozier, Kate Bremond, Walter E. Lufkin and his wife, Henrietta C. Lufkin, and Julia Bremond, a minor, against T. W. House and other creditors of the company.
The petition alleges that the company was incorporated by an act of the Legislature of Texas, approved March 11, 1875; that Paul Bremond had died shortly before the institution of the suit, being the owner of the whole of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gilman v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Company. Coykendall, Garnishee v. IdemSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- American Bridge Co. v. HeidelbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Miller v. Kendall, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- D. Sullivan & Co. v. Texas Briquette & Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
- Houston Ice & Brewing Co. v. ClintCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Hamman v. H. J. McMullen & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1933
- Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.