Legal Opinion
Inesco, Inc. v. Sears
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 18, 1978No. 8092PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAYTON, Justice.
Following our original opinion in his cause, we have granted appellant Gray permission to file his amended brief; and our prior opinion in this cause is withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted in lieu thereof.
Plaintiff below, Sears, filed this action against Inesco, Inc., Trans-Mex Leasing Company, G. & L. Tool Company, and Elmer Gray, for the recovery of $40,000 he claimed was owed on the purchase price of a barge. Trial was to the court without a jury, and judgment was entered for plaintiff, holding the defendants, Inesco, Trans-' Mex, and Gray, jointly and severally…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Bell Oil & Gas Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
- Sutton v. Reagan & GeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Mortgageamerica Corporation, Debtor. The American National Bank of Austin v. Mortgageamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Huff v. Harrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Smith v. Moody (In Re Moody)District Court, S.D. Texas · 1987
- Day v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Womack v. First National Bank of San AugustineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.