Means v. Baltimore County
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
In this Workers’ Compensation case, we must decide whether post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) unaccompanied by physical disease may be compensable as an occupational disease under the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act, now codified as Title 9 of the Labor and Employment Article of the Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol., 1996 Cum.Supp.). 1 We shall hold that PTSD can be compensable as an occupational disease.
I
Appellant Doreen Kay Means has been employed by Baltimore County since 1986. She was initially hired as a Certified Respiratory Therapist, also known as a paramedic, based at…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bailey v. American General Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- Pathfinder Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Sparks v. Tulane Med. Ctr. Hosp. & ClinicSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- King v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE'S CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Mayor of Baltimore City v. JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Baltimore Cnty. v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Chaney Enterprises Ltd. Partnership v. WindsorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.