Legal Opinion

Baltimore Cnty. v. Quinlan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 26, 2019No. 50/18PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baltimore County, Maryland v. Michael Quinlan, No. 50, September Term, 2018, Opinion by Adkins, J. MARYLAND WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ACT—OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE—LE § 9-502(D)—PARAMEDIC/FIREFIGHTERS—DEGENERATIVE MENISCAL TEARS: Pursuant to Maryland Code Ann. (1991, 2016 Repl. Vol.), § 9- 502(d) of the Labor and Employment Article (“LE”), an occupational disease is only compensable if: (1) it is “due to the nature of an employment in which hazards of the occupational disease exist”; and (2) “it reasonably may be concluded that the occupational disease was incurred as a result of the employment of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Metropolitan Mortgage Fund, Inc. v. BasilikoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Liggett & Meyers Tobacco Co. v. GoslinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montgomery Cnty. v. Cochran & BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. Bethesda African Cemetery Coal. v. Housing Opp. Comm.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Hare v. David S. Brown EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  4. In re: City of HagerstownCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  5. In the Matter of Morgan Stanley & Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API