Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore City v. Johnson

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 23, 2004No. 01061, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

A retired firefighter who is also disabled as a result of an occupational disease is entitled under the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act (the “Act”) to collect both service pension benefits and compensation benefits, in a sum not to exceed the firefighter’s weekly salary. Polomski v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 344 Md. 70, 684 A.2d 1338 (1996). In this appeal, we must determine whether a firefighter’s surviving, dependent spouse is similarly entitled to collect both service related pension benefits and workers’ compensation benefits when the firefighter’s death…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Mazor v. State, Dep't of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Comptroller of Maryland v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Del Marr v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Chaney Enterprises Ltd. Partnership v. WindsorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Johnson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API