Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Heilman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1932No. 677PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The First National Bank & Trust Company brought 'this action against Heilman to recover upon two promissory notes for $2,000 each, dated September 9,1929, due six months after date, made by Heilman, payable to F. E. Mockel and J. E. Campbell, endorsed and delivered by the payees to E. L. Lindner, and endorsed arid delivered by Lindner to the bank.
Heilman set up as a defense that the payees, acting as Lindner’s agents, by false and fraudulent representations induced him; to purchase ten acres of land from Lindner, and that the notes were given in Kansas to cover…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Pana v. BowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Queenan v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. AdamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
- Wright v. Board of Public Instruction for SumterSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Commercial Trust Co. of New Jersey v. KealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Grinnell Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945