Legal Opinion
Blair-Bey v. Quick
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 24, 1998No. 96-5280PublishedCited by 280 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALD, Circuit Judge:
This case is one of three companion eases that we decide today; the three cases address interrelated issues bearing on prisoner litigation.
In this action, Clarence Blair-Bey, a prison inmate in the custody of the D.C. Department of Corrections, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the procedures by which he was denied parole, on due process and ex post facto clause grounds. He named as defendants (among others) the D.C. Board of Parole and the United States Parole Commission. The district court dismissed Blair-Bey’s petition, finding that the federal courts are…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by280 opinions
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Carlos Pelaez-Edison Carmona v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, MargaretCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Gary Laguerre v. Janet Reno, Jose, Martin Avelar-Cruz v. Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
275 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.