Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Harbor Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1978No. Civ. 50771PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
Following a nonjury trial, judgment was entered declaring that insureds under two insurance policies were not entitled to reimbursement for expenses claimed pursuant to “sue and labor” clauses contained in each policy. Insureds appeal from the judgment.
A consortium consisting of six utility corporations and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, headed by Southern California Edison Company, 1 joined together to construct a coal-fired steam generating plant located near Farmington, New Mexico. The plant comprised units Nos. 4 and 5 of a larger complex…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Reliance Insurance Company v. The Yacht Escapade Ex the Thor II Etc., Reliance Insurance Company v. Howard BondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Leebov v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- McNeilab, Inc. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Weitz Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Home Insurance v. Landmark InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.