Legal Opinion
Calladine v. Dana Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 29, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-CV-1739-DTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WOODS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Panzy Calladme brings this action individually and as guardian of her husband William Calladme. On May 30, 1978, William was working for defendant Dana Corporation (Dana) at its plant in Ecorse, Michigan. After drinking at a water fountain, William was struck and seriously injured by a fork lift truck. He has been mentally impaired since the time of the accident. He seeks damages resulting from Dana’s allegedly intentional assault, i.e., knowingly exposing him to a hazardous working condition without providing any warnings. Panzy…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Selk v. Detroit Plastic ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Davidson v. Baker-Vander Veen Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Professional Rehabilitation Associates v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Smith v. Mirror Lite Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency v. PappasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Doe v. Jayark Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Travis v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.