Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Baker-Vander Veen Construction Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1971No. Docket 10626PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The trial judge entered an accelerated judgment dismissing plaintiff Jóe Davidson’s complaint as to added defendants, Process Solvent Company, Inc., and William L. VanTongeren, doing business as Mercury Building Maintenance, on the ground that his claims were barred by a statute of limitation. Davidson appeals.

The added defendants were not served until after the three-year period prescribed by the statute 1 had expired. Davidson relies on a tolling provision, claiming that he was insane at the time his claim accrued and, accordingly, the time for bringing his action was extended and the added…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Erickson v. GOODELL OIL CO. INC.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Emery v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Zamler v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Lemmerman v. FealkMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Collins v. DunifonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Hill v. Clark Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API