Doe v. Jayark Corp.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE [16] AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT APPOINT A NEU-ROPSYCHOLOGIST PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 706

JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.

This case arises out of a product liability action stemming from Jane Doe’s (“Jane”) *611fall from a bunk bed manufactured by defendant Jayark Corp. (“Jayark”), and imported and distributed by defendant Ro-salco, Inc. (“Rosalco”). Plaintiffs Robert and Sally Doe are Jane’s parents and legal guardians. The fall occurred on March 11, 1995, at an…