Legal Opinion
R.P. v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 22, 2007No. Civil Action 06-1496 (EGS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
R.P. and his parents, Reuben and Dietra Pinn (collectively “plaintiffs”) appeal an adverse Hearing Officer Decision (“HOD”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. The HOD was issued on May 25, 2006 and plaintiffs filed their complaint in this Court on August 24, 2006. Defendants have moved to dismiss because plaintiffs did not file their appeal within ninety days of the administrative hearing officer’s decision. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
The IDEA…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shirley C. Shehadeh v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Charles Starbuck v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Joseph Spiegler v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Baker v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
3Cited by10 opinions
- Douglass v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Maynard Ex Rel. D.M. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Cummings Ex Rel. J.C. v. Woodson Senior High SchoolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Theodore Ex Rel. A.G. v. Government of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- J.S. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.