Legal Opinion
J.S. v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 7, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1265 (RMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs, Patrice Stephens and J.S., a minor, appeal to this Court to reverse a Hearing Officer Decision (“HOD”) issued pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (“IDEIA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. They also advance claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) and 29 U.S.C. § 794 of the Rehabilitation Act (“Section 504”). See Compl. [Dkt. #1]. In response, the District of Columbia filed a partial motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Section 1983 and Section 504 claims for failure to state a claim under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Shekoyan v. Sibley International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Pitney Bowes Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Alliance for Democracy v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- R.P. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ANACOSTIA RIVERKEEPER, INC. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Maynard Ex Rel. D.M. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Anacostia Riverkeeper, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011