Legal Opinion

Boedingheimer v. Lake Country Transportation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1992No. CX-91-2110Published

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This case involves the interpretation and validity of a rule of the Department of Labor and Industry which establishes a medical fee schedule for health care servic es for workers’ compensation injuries. The decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) ruled that the fee schedule set out in the rule applied to hospital services. We reverse.

In 1988 and 1989, Memorial Hospital and Home of Perham (Perham Hospital) submitted bills to the employee’s workers’ compensation carrier, State Fund Mutual Insurance Company, for services rendered to the employee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Quam v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State, by Spannaus v. Lloyd A. Fry Roof. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API