Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dibble

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding against a member of the Oregon State Bar, arising from charges as alleged in two separate complaints and after a hearing on each complaint.

At the first hearing, held on April 23, 1969, evidence was offered that the acensed had appeared on three separate occasions in the circuit court in Multnomah county before a judge who testified that, in his opinion, the accused was under the influence of intoxicating liquor on each of these occasions. Evidence was also offered that the accused had been convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In re GreggOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Cameron v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ForeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API