Legal Opinion
Harper v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 29, 1998No. 97-4364PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs in this case are four males formerly employed by Blockbuster Entertainment Corp. (“Blockbuster”). They brought this suit against Blockbuster under Title VII and the Florida Civil Rights Act alleging that Blockbuster’s grooming policy discriminated against them on the basis of their sex and that they were wrongfully terminated in retaliation for protesting that policy. After the district court granted Blockbuster’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint, the plaintiffs appealed. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the district court’s order…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Little v. United TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- D. Lisa CLOVER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Jennifer Kimbrough v. Harden Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Durante Neal, a Minor by His Next Friends Eugene Neal, Plaintiffs v. Fulton County Board of Education, Stephen Dolinger, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Hudson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Kendra Munoz v. Selig Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.