Legal Opinion
Lonnie Kimbro v. Pepsico, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 2, 2000No. 99-2823PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
Lonnie Kimbro sued his former employer, Frito-Lay, for having violated the federal age discrimination law by firing him, allegedly on account of his being over 40. He joined with this claim a supplemental claim under state law against two of his supervisors at Frito-Lay, plus Super Valu, Inc., doing business under the name of Shop ’N Save, and a Shop ’N Save store manager named Ansell, for tortious interference with his employment contract with Frito-Lay. (Other defendants have fallen by the wayside.) The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants.
With…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hedges v. MuscoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Healy v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Wynn v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- United Airlines, Inc. v. Mesa Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- O'DONNELL v. BoggsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Spoerle v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.