Legal Opinion
Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Preston
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 30, 1971No. 7 Div. 890PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
In the declaratory proceedings below the Chancellor decreed that Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the insurer, was obligated under either of two identical automobile insurance policies, to defend Arch D. Preston, Jr., in a suit brought against Preston by Beulah Smith, and to pay any judgment arising from said suit within the limits of either policy.
The suit arose out of a collision between a Dodge automobile driven by' Preston, but belonging to his son-in-law, and an automobile driven by Beulah Smith.
At the time of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HannaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Phillips v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Goens v. ArinderMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- Drew v. DrewSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854
- Holloway v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Crossett v. St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Green v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Fleming v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Lammers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.