Legal Opinion

Finsel v. Hartshorn

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided April 25, 2002No. 2:00-cv-02239PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McCUSKEY, District Judge.

This case is before the court for ruling on a Motion for Summary Judgment (# 46) filed by Defendants Tom Cruppenink and Daniel Auterman and a Motion for Summary Judgment (# 50) filed by Plaintiff, Charles F. Finsel. Following this court’s careful and thorough review of the documents filed by the parties and the arguments of the parties, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (# 50) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (#46) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. This case remains set for a final pretrial conference on…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ghameshlouy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  2. Ghameshlouy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API