Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ghameshlouy v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 5, 2009No. Record 1882-07-1Published

1DissentHaley, J.

I respectfully dissent.

Justice Brown wrote: “Jurisdiction is the power to adjudicate a case on the merits and dispose of it as justice may require.” The Resolute, 168 U.S. 437, 439, 18 S.Ct. 112, 113, 42 L.Ed. 533 (1897). But, “Jurisdiction is a word of many, too many, meanings.” United States v. Vanness, 85 F.3d 661, 663 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1996), quoted with approval in Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 90, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 1010,140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998).

“Clarity would be facilitated if courts and litigants used the label ‘jurisdictional’, not for claim-processing rules, but only…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  5. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API