Legal Opinion
Lim Kwock Soon v. Brownell
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 18, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 7022PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
BACKGROUND:
The case was tried before me in 1956. In my findings, reported 143 F.Supp. *964388, I found the case fraudulent, rejected the evidence as incredible and denied plaintiffs relief for the reason that they had not discharged their burden of proof. On appeal, Lim Kwock Soon et al. v. Brownell, Attorney General, 5 Cir., 253 F.2d 809, the action of the district court was found to be a mistake. The judgment was reversed and the cause remanded with directions that judgment be rendered declaring that Lim Kwock Soon and Lim Kwock Min, and each of them, are nationals…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edward H. Harned, Jr. v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Lim Kwock Soon v. BrownellDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966