Legal Opinion

Roth v. Roth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Alice E. Roth (Alice) appeals the trial court’s judgment denying her claim against Clarence T. Roth (Clarence) for division of property. We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] Clarence and Alice were married on June 22, 1985. Clarence was sixty-eight years old and Alice was forty-seven years old at the time. On June 10, a few days before .they married, they entered into an antenup-tial agreement which is the center of this dispute and reads as follows:

THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of June, 1985, by and between Clarence T. Roth of Parkston, South…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Culhane v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Singpiel v. MorrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Icehouse, Inc. v. GeisslerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Harksen v. PeskaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API