Roth v. Roth
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Alice E. Roth (Alice) appeals the trial court’s judgment denying her claim against Clarence T. Roth (Clarence) for division of property. We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] Clarence and Alice were married on June 22, 1985. Clarence was sixty-eight years old and Alice was forty-seven years old at the time. On June 10, a few days before .they married, they entered into an antenup-tial agreement which is the center of this dispute and reads as follows:
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of June, 1985, by and between Clarence T. Roth of Parkston, South…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Culhane v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Singpiel v. MorrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Icehouse, Inc. v. GeisslerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Harksen v. PeskaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.