Legal Opinion

Shoffner v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 1, 1931No. 22657PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.

This is a proceeding in error, 'brought by the county superintendent of public instruction of Bryan county, to relieve himself from the obligations to obey an order of mandamus, made originally in the alternative, by the district judge, and later peremptory by the district court. The findings and judgment complained of can be found ón page 89A of the) record, and are as follows:

“Findings of Fact.
“Now, on the 27th day of July, 1931, the court after hearing the testimony of the witnesses introduced by the plaintiff and the defendant and the argument of counsel, makes the following findings of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. School District No. 17 v. ZedikerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Means v. VernonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Shofner v. MercerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API