Legal Opinion
Shofner v. Mercer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1933No. 23451PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDLISON, V. C. J.
Flossie Mercer, as plaintiff, instituted suit in the district court, seeking a writ of mandamus against S. D. Shofner, county superintendent of Bryan county, Okla., requiring said defendant to approve a contract entered into by and between Flossie Mercer and the school board of district No. 15, Bryan county, Okla. Defendant answered, in which he denied that any legal contract was presented to him for approval between plaintiff and school district No. 15. Bryan county, Okla. Defendant pleaded some additional facts, but upon the trial of said cause the issues settled to a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- School Dist. No. 94, Grant Co. v. GautierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Means v. VernonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- School District No. 5 v. ColvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Armstrong v. Union School District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- School Dist. No. 18 of Creek County v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. DoroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Johnson v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937