Legal Opinion
Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 20, 1931No. 21855PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This appeal is from a judgment denying mandamus. The writ -was sought to compel the excise board to approve an item in the estimate or appropriation, of $6,350, duly submitted for salary and expense of a city court of Enid, Okla., said to liave been created by section 4691, et seq., C. O. S. 1921. F. W. Herndon maintained tbat be was tbe duly appointed and qualified judge of said court and under authority of Board of Ed. of Oity of Guthrie v. Excise Board of Logan County, 86 Okla. 24, 206 Pac. 517, asserted that mandamus would lie to compel the making of a levy provided by law.
On the other…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State ex rel. Dickason v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Holcomb v. SpikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Oklahoma Light & Power Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Higgins v. Brown, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State Ex Rel. West, Atty. Gen. v. BreckinridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cahill v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Excise Board, Washita County v. LowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Board of Com'rs of Coal County v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Elliott v. State Ex Rel. Kirk-PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Ervin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.