Legal Opinion

Means v. Vernon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1925No. 15709PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Hughes county, Okla., by the defendant in error, A. B. Vernon, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error herein, Alice Means, who was superintendent of public instruction for said county, to .secure a writ of mandamus requiring the said Alice Means to approve a contract entered into by and betweejn the school board of school district No. 39, Hughes county, Okla., and the said A. B. Vernon.

The plaintiff alleges, in. substance, that he is a duly licensed and authorized school teacher and has a good and valid teacher’s certificate authorizing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lovett, Creek County Com'rs v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Champlin v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. BeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Ward v. Board of Co. Com'rs, Okfuskee Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Shofner v. MercerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Shoffner v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API