Legal Opinion

STATE PATROL LIEUTENANTS ASS'N v. Sandberg

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 7, 1997No. 20893-8-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

— The Washington State Patrol Lieutenants Association brought this declaratory judgment action to establish its statutory right to engage in collective bargaining over wages and wage-related matters. The Washington State Patrol and Annette Sandberg, its chief, opposed the Association’s position, contending that RCW 41.56.030(4) prohibits collective bargaining as to wage-related matters. The trial court granted summary judgment to the Association. We conclude that the statute excludes wage-related topics from mandatory bargaining, but does not prohibit the parties from negotiating over wages…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Sehome Park Care Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Nova ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Navlet v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Navlet v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Camp Finance, L.L.C. v. BrazingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Camp Finance, LLC v. BrazingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API