STATE PATROL LIEUTENANTS ASS'N v. Sandberg
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
— The Washington State Patrol Lieutenants Association brought this declaratory judgment action to establish its statutory right to engage in collective bargaining over wages and wage-related matters. The Washington State Patrol and Annette Sandberg, its chief, opposed the Association’s position, contending that RCW 41.56.030(4) prohibits collective bargaining as to wage-related matters. The trial court granted summary judgment to the Association. We conclude that the statute excludes wage-related topics from mandatory bargaining, but does not prohibit the parties from negotiating over wages…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Diversified Industries Development Corp. v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Sehome Park Care Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Briggs v. Nova ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Navlet v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Navlet v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Camp Finance, L.L.C. v. BrazingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Camp Finance, LLC v. BrazingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.