Legal Opinion
Navlet v. Port of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 2008No. 78866-9PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
194 P.3d 221 (2008)
Jack M. NAVLET, Andrew E. Jenkins, Jack Godfrey, Louis Barrow, B.J. Schwartz, Arthur Camp, Ronald Newenhof, Timothy O'Brien, and Michael Miller, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Appellants,
v.
The PORT OF SEATTLE, Respondent.
No. 78866-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued September 14, 2006.
Decided October 16, 2008.
James D. Oswald, Law Offices of James D. Oswald, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.
Richard J. Birmingham, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
OWENS, J.
ś 1 This case requires the determination of whether…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- Storti v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Washington Education Ass'n v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Marconi v. City of JolietAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.