Legal Opinion
Camp Finance, L.L.C. v. Brazington
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 25, 2006No. 24460-1-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1 Washington law requires that notice of a sheriff’s sale be sent only to the judgment debtor; junior lienholders need not be notified. RCW 6.21.030(1); RCW 6.23.030(1). The judgment creditor here, Hersel and Sharon Brazington and Stanley Brazington, did not notify a junior lienholder (Camp Finance, L.L.C.) of a sheriff’s sale. Camp Finance challenged the statutory scheme as unconstitutional. But it did not properly plead that challenge. And since the applicable statutes do not require notice, we affirm the summary dismissal of Camp Finance’s complaint.
Sweeney, C.J.
*159FACTS
¶2 Thomas and Denise…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- American Continental Insurance v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- American Continental Ins. Co. v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Yousoufian v. Office of Ron SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Yousoufian v. Office of King County ExecutiveWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Kendall v. Douglas, Grant, Lincoln, & Okanogan Counties Public Hospital District No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. Quality Loan Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Camp Finance, LLC v. BrazingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Federal Home Loan Bank Of Seattle v. Rbs Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- SCM Group USA, Inc. v. Protek Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Cottages At The Heights Condo Owners Assoc. v. Jayakrishnan K. Nair, Et AnoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.